Misdeclaration of software value requires concealment; disclosed documents defeated confiscation and personal penalty.

Imported computer software was alleged to be misdeclared in value because the invoice included training, conversion, modification, post-implementation and travel costs. The customs authorities could, however, ascertain the actual software value from the invoice and bill of entry themselves. The Tribunal held that an overstatement in the invoice, without suppression or concealment and where the true value is otherwise discernible from disclosed documents, does not justify confiscation for misdeclaration or personal penalty. Confiscation under the Customs Act and penalty were therefore unjustified.

---

---

Issues: Whether imported computer software could be confiscated and penalty imposed on the ground of misdeclaration of value when the invoice and bill of entry disclosed the amounts paid and the customs authorities could determine the actual value from those particulars.

Analysis: The value declared in the invoice included various components such as training, conversion, modification, post-implementation expenditure and travel expenses. The customs authorities found that the actual value of the software was lower than the invoiced amount and proceeded to confiscate the goods under Section 111(m) of the Customs Act, 1962 and impose penalty under Section 112(a) of the Customs Act, 1962. The Tribunal held that where the authorities themselves can ascertain the actual value from the disclosed documents, mere overstatement in the invoice does not justify confiscation for misdeclaration. It further held that there was no suppression or concealment and no basis for personal penalty.

Conclusion: Confiscation and penalty were unjustified and the importer succeeded.

---