Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant was entitled to the benefit of the transitional provisions in the EXIM Policy for the imported goods so as to avoid the import restriction and consequential confiscation and penalty.
Analysis: The relevant restriction under the EXIM Policy came into force on 25-3-1996. The letter of credit had been established before that date, and the shipment was cleared within the transitional period contemplated by the policy. The counting of forty-five days was to be made from the date of imposition of restriction, not from the date of the letter of credit or duty payment alone. On that basis, the import was covered by the transitional protection and the restrictive classification was not applicable to the appellant's consignment.
Conclusion: The appellant was entitled to the benefit of the transitional provisions and the order of confiscation and penalty could not be sustained.