Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the inscription "duplicate for transporter" on the invoice was required to be printed or whether a rubber stamp endorsement sufficed.
Analysis: The Tribunal accepted the settled view that the requirement was only directory and not mandatory. A rubber stamp carrying the endorsement was treated as a valid compliance, and the invoice was not held to be invalid on that ground.
Conclusion: The rubber stamp endorsement was sufficient and the invoice was not vitiated.