CEGAT rejects adjournment request, prioritizes hearings over Central Excise official. The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Calcutta rejected a Miscellaneous Application seeking adjournment as the reason given was not considered valid, emphasizing ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
CEGAT rejects adjournment request, prioritizes hearings over Central Excise official.
The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Calcutta rejected a Miscellaneous Application seeking adjournment as the reason given was not considered valid, emphasizing the priority of hearings before them over the Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise. The application was rejected.
The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Calcutta rejected a Miscellaneous Application seeking adjournment as the reason given for adjournment was not considered valid. The Tribunal emphasized that hearing before them should not be given less priority than appearing before the Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise. The application was rejected. [1997 (4) TMI 286 - CEGAT, CALCUTTA]
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.