Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
<h1>Appellate Tribunal Allows Credit for 5% Palladium Catalyst Input</h1> <h3>NARMADA CHEMATUR PETROCHEM. Versus COMMR. OF C. EX. & CUS., VADODARA</h3> The Mumbai appellate tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing credit for '5% palladium-on-carbon-catalyst' as an input under Rule 57G, ... Stay/Dispensation of pre-deposit - Penalty The appellate tribunal in Mumbai heard a case where the assessees declared 'Palladium' as an input under Rule 57G, but the actual inputs received were '5% palladium-on-carbon-catalyst' classified under sub-heading 3815.00. The lower authority denied credit and imposed a penalty, which was upheld by the Commissioner (Appeals). The appellant argued that they had not taken Modvat credit in a mala fide manner, citing a tribunal judgment. The tribunal waived the pre-deposit condition of the penalty amount of Rs. 20,000 during the appeal's pendency.