Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether goods received under Chapter X procedure pursuant to an exemption notification continued to retain that status after withdrawal of the notification, and whether Rule 196-BB of the Central Excise Rules permitted their removal for further processing or testing.
Analysis: The goods were received in the factory when Notification No. 167/79 was in force and had accordingly been brought in under Chapter X procedure. Rule 196-BB specifically permits goods received under that procedure to be taken for testing or for carrying out any other operation necessary for completion of the industrial process and to be returned to the assessee's premises. Once the goods had been lawfully received under the notification and the Chapter X procedure, withdrawal of the notification did not alter the character of the goods as having been received under that procedure.
Conclusion: The withdrawal of Notification No. 167/79 did not deprive the goods of their Chapter X status, and removal under Rule 196-BB was permissible. The issue was decided against the Revenue and in favour of the assessee.