Prima facie classification dispute and revenue neutrality justified waiver of pre-deposit and interim protection pending appeal.

In a classification dispute over beverage bases or concentrates, the Tribunal treated the classification issue as arguable, including the relevant Chapter Note position and the competing description of the goods as mixtures or compounded preparations. It also noted revenue neutrality, because duty paid on the goods would be available as credit in the manufacture of beverages. On that combined basis, the appellant was held to have established a strong prima facie case, justifying waiver of pre-deposit and interim protection pending disposal of the appeal on merits.

---

---

Issues: Whether the appellant made out a prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit of duty and interim protection pending hearing of the appeal.

Analysis: The demand arose from a classification dispute between competing tariff headings for beverage bases or concentrates. The materials before the Tribunal indicated that the classification issue was arguable, including the effect of the Chapter Note position for the relevant period and the competing characterisation of the goods as mixtures or compounded preparations. The Tribunal also noticed the plea of revenue neutrality, since duty paid on the goods would be available as credit in the manufacture of beverages. On this basis, the appellant was found to have a good prima facie case.

Conclusion: Waiver of pre-deposit was justified and interim protection was granted in favour of the assessee.

Final Conclusion: The appeal was directed to be heard on the merits without insisting on immediate deposit, and the operative position was preserved in the meantime.

Ratio Decidendi: In an interlocutory classification dispute, a strong prima facie case coupled with revenue neutrality can justify waiver of pre-deposit and interim protection.

---