Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellants were entitled to the benefit of Notification No. 162/86 as amended by Notification No. 89/90 dated 2-3-1990 for motor vehicles used for transport of goods.
Analysis: The conditions of the amended notification required that no credit of duty paid on the chassis and other inputs should have been availed and that the vehicle be manufactured out of a chassis on which the specified excise duty had been paid. The department did not dispute compliance with these conditions. The entitlement to the nil rate of duty therefore depended on satisfaction of the notification requirements, which was established on the record.
Conclusion: The benefit of the exemption notification was available to the appellants.