Introducing the βIn Favour Ofβ filter in Case Laws.
- βοΈ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- π Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws β


Just a moment...
Introducing the βIn Favour Ofβ filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws β


Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
<h1>CEGAT Appeal: Fire-fighting Items Classification Dispute Partially Allowed</h1> The appeal before the Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, New Delhi regarding the classification of fire-fighting items under the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 ... Classification The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, New Delhi heard an appeal regarding the classification of fire-fighting items under the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. The items were classified under Heading 84.24 instead of 84.79, and the benefit of Notification 111/88 was denied as they were not complete fire extinguishers. The appeal was partly allowed, classifying the items under Heading 84.24 but rejecting the claim for the notification benefit.