Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether iron and steel forgings roughly shaped from bars, rods, blooms, billets, slabs and sheets were classifiable under Heading 7208.00 or Heading 7308.00 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985.
Analysis: The dispute turned on the character of the goods at the stage of manufacture and the tariff treatment consistently adopted for forgings that had undergone only proof machining. The Board circular and the consistent view of the Tribunal treated such articles as roughly shaped pieces, and the classification was to be understood in accordance with established trade understanding under Chapter 72. On that basis, goods requiring further machining continued to fall within Heading 72.08.
Conclusion: The goods were classifiable under Heading 72.08 and not under Heading 73.08, and the classification claimed by the assessee was accepted.
Ratio Decidendi: Forgings that have been subjected only to proof machining and still require further machining are classifiable as roughly shaped articles under Heading 72.08 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985.