Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the matter should be remanded to the adjudicating authority for consideration of additional exemption pleas raised before the Tribunal.
Analysis: The Tribunal noted that the newly raised pleas relating to exemption under Notification No. 246/88-C.E. and Notification No. 217/86-C.E. went to the root of the controversy on duty liability. Since those pleas had not been examined by the lower authorities, the matter required reconsideration at the adjudicatory stage.
Conclusion: Remand was warranted for examination of the additional exemption contentions.
Final Conclusion: The impugned order was set aside and the dispute was sent back for fresh consideration of the relevant exemption issues.
Ratio Decidendi: Where material exemption pleas going to the root of duty liability have not been considered by the lower authorities, remand is appropriate for adjudication of those issues.