Exemption for composite light fittings must be tested by metal-glass weight under later Board clarification

Eligibility for exemption on composite light fittings and fixtures under Notification No. 96/86-C.E. had to be reconsidered in light of a later Board circular clarifying that, for composite articles, the relevant test is the relative weight of metal and glass. The clarification issued under Notification No. 80/90-C.E. was treated as applicable because the two notifications were regarded as pari materia. As that guidance had not been available to the original adjudicating authority, the matter was set aside and remanded for fresh readjudication after applying the circular and examining whether the products otherwise met the notification conditions.

---

---

Issues: Whether the matter required remand for fresh adjudication of the appellant's claim to exemption under Notification No. 96/86-C.E. in the light of a later Board circular clarifying how the notification is to be applied to composite articles.

Analysis: The disputed goods were light fittings and fixtures classifiable under Tariff Heading 9405.00. The controversy centred on whether they were excluded as goods made of glass, or whether the benefit of the exemption notification could be extended because the metal component predominated. A subsequent Board clarification issued in the context of Notification No. 80/90-C.E. stated that eligibility in the case of composite articles should be determined by the relative weight of metal and glass. Since Notification No. 80/90-C.E. and Notification No. 96/86-C.E. were treated as pari materia, the clarification was considered relevant to the controversy, though it had not been available to the adjudicating authority earlier.

Conclusion: The impugned order was set aside and the matter was remanded for readjudication by applying the circular and examining whether the products otherwise satisfied its conditions.

---