Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether HDPE sacks made out of fabric woven on circular looms were entitled to exemption under Notification No. 223/86-C.E., and whether the subsequent amendment by Notification No. 57/90 dated 20-3-1990 was clarificatory so as to indicate the original scope of the exemption.
Analysis: The exemption notification, as it stood during the relevant period, excluded sacks manufactured on circular looms. The Tribunal accepted the Revenue's construction that the exclusion would cover sacks made from fabric produced on circular looms, since looms produce fabric and the notification could not be read in a manner that would make the exclusion ineffective. The later insertion of an explanation by Notification No. 57/90 was treated as clarificatory, showing that the original proviso already contained the same meaning.
Conclusion: The HDPE sacks were not entitled to the exemption under the earlier notification, and the refund claims were rightly rejected.
Final Conclusion: The appeals failed because the exemption was held inapplicable to the goods for the relevant period, and the later amendment was treated as confirming the pre-existing position.