Classification of composite containers and fibre drums under Tariff Item 68 prevailed, defeating the exemption claim.

Composite containers and fibre drums were treated as classifiable under Tariff Item 68, not Tariff Item 17(4), because the Tribunal followed its earlier final order classifying the same goods for another period. That prior classification remained controlling for the later dispute, so the contrary exemption claim based on Tariff Item 17(4) could not succeed. The impugned order was affirmed and the appeals were rejected.

---

---

Issues: Whether composite containers and fibre drums were classifiable under Tariff Item 17(4) or Tariff Item 68 of the Schedule to the erstwhile Central Excise Tariff, and whether the assessee was entitled to the claimed exemption.

Analysis: The Tribunal followed its earlier final order, which had already confirmed classification of the same goods under Tariff Item 68 for a different period. As that order remained in force, the same reasoning was applied to the dispute before it. On that basis, the claimed classification under Tariff Item 17(4) was negatived, and the exemption claim based on the contrary classification could not succeed.

Conclusion: The goods were held classifiable under Tariff Item 68 and not under Tariff Item 17(4); the assessee's challenge failed.

Final Conclusion: The impugned order was affirmed and the appeals were rejected.

Ratio Decidendi: Where an earlier final order has already determined the classification of the same goods, that ratio may be followed for a subsequent period unless displaced by a contrary legal basis.

---