Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the order confirming duty and penalty was vitiated because the adjudicating authority relied on investigations conducted after the personal hearing without putting the assessee on notice, warranting remand for fresh decision.
Analysis: The appellants had already been heard when the personal hearing was fixed. The adjudicating authority thereafter visited the unit and made factual inquiries regarding the manufacture of steam, but based the conclusion on that post-hearing investigation without informing the appellants or giving them an opportunity to meet the material collected. Reliance on such material, gathered after hearing and without notice, introduced an infirmity and offended the requirements of fair hearing.
Conclusion: The order was set aside and the matter was remanded for a fresh decision after affording reasonable opportunity of hearing and complying with the principles of natural justice.