Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Mill Wrapper captively consumed in the manufacture of Reel Core, which is further used for winding paper, was eligible for exemption under Notification No. 217/86-C.E. dated 02.04.1986.
Analysis: The same respondents had earlier obtained a final order granting the benefit of the notification to Mill Wrapper used in the manufacture of Reel Core and then for winding paper. That earlier determination was held applicable to the present facts, and the Tribunal followed the same ratio. The Revenue's objection based on the availability of exemption for Reel Core under Notification No. 139/88-C.E. was not accepted as a basis to deny the benefit claimed for Mill Wrapper.
Conclusion: The Mill Wrapper was held eligible for exemption under Notification No. 217/86-C.E. and the Revenue's appeal was rejected.