Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the imported fuel injector was classifiable under Heading 84.06 or Heading 84.10, and whether the refund/reclassification dispute required remand because the authorities below had not adjudicated the claim with reference to the correct item.
Analysis: The refund claim was specifically founded on reclassification of the fuel injector, but the orders below proceeded on the basis of fuel pump classification. As the authorities had not examined the issue actually raised and had not applied their mind to the classification of the fuel injector, the dispute could not be finally resolved on the existing record. The matter therefore required reconsideration by the adjudicating authority with reference only to the fuel injector and after granting an opportunity of hearing.
Conclusion: The classification dispute was remanded for fresh decision on the fuel injector alone, and the appeal succeeded to that extent.