Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the imported creped kraft paper was entitled to the benefit of Notification No. 37-Customs dated 1-3-1978, and whether the Customs laboratory test report could be relied upon to deny the exemption.
Analysis: The imported goods had been provisionally cleared, and the Customs authorities relied upon a sample obtained from the importer for testing. The Court found no basis to reject the test report of the National Test House, a reputed expert body, merely because the appellants disputed the applicability of the standards used. The report was supported by technical particulars, and the appellants produced no contrary test report or reliable technical material to displace it. On the materials available, there was no sufficient ground to hold that the report was invalid or that the goods answered the description required for the exemption.
Conclusion: The imported goods were not established to be electrical grade kraft paper entitled to the notification benefit, and the test report was rightly relied upon.
Final Conclusion: The order denying exemption was sustained and the appeal failed.
Ratio Decidendi: A duly issued expert laboratory report on the nature and quality of imported goods will ordinarily be accepted unless the importer produces convincing contrary technical evidence showing that the report is unreliable or inapplicable.