TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Appeal reinstated after bank guarantee submission, despite non-appearance. Adjournment requested, not deliberate.</h1> <h3>CYANAMID INDIA LIMITED Versus COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE, VADODARA</h3> CYANAMID INDIA LIMITED Versus COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE, VADODARA - 1998 (101) E.L.T. 76 (Tribunal) The appeal was dismissed for non-compliance with Section 35F of the Central Excise Act and default in appearance under CEGAT rules. The appellants had furnished a valid bank guarantee as per the Stay Order terms. Non-appearance was due to seeking an adjournment, not deliberate. The appeal was restored and scheduled for hearing on 18-5-1998.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
