Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether waiver of pre-deposit could be granted in respect of disputed Modvat credit relating to capital goods used in quarrying limestone, civil structures, goods imported in the name of the registered office and refractories.
Analysis: The claim relating to refractories was prima facie supported because refractories were specified as capital goods under Rule 57Q. The objection based on the Bill of Entry being in the name of the registered office was also found prima facie untenable. The objection regarding civil structures was not accepted as a strong ground for denial at this stage. However, the claim relating to goods used in quarrying limestone was found arguable, and the distinction between Rule 57A and Rule 57Q was treated as significant.
Outcome: On a prima facie assessment, partial waiver of pre-deposit was granted on condition of depositing Rs. 8 lakhs, and recovery of the balance was stayed.