Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the respondent was entitled to Modvat credit on consignments received as rounds of non-alloy steel, or whether the goods were in substance scrap so as to disentitle credit.
Analysis: The consignments were endorsed by the original consignees as not conforming to the ordered specifications and were sold to the respondent after rejection. The record did not show that the consignees had worked upon the goods to alter their shape or size. The department's assertion that the goods received were scrap rather than rounds was unsupported by material, and no adequate basis was shown to disturb the finding that the goods were rejected consignments sold to the respondent.
Conclusion: The respondent's entitlement to Modvat credit was upheld and the department's challenge failed.