Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether slitted cotton fabrics supplied for manufacture of typewriter ribbons had, by reason of Rule 2(a), acquired the essential character of finished typewriter ribbons and were classifiable under Tariff Heading 96.12.
Analysis: The admitted manufacturing process showed that slitted cotton fabrics had to undergo further operations of glueing, stamping, inking and packing before they became typewriter ribbons. The evidence also indicated that these essential processes were carried out at the recipient's factory and not on the goods as cleared by the appellant. Rule 2(a) applies only where incomplete or unfinished goods already possess the essential character of the complete article. Mere slitted fabrics, being in the nature of raw material, did not by themselves acquire that essential character.
Conclusion: The goods cleared by the appellant were not typewriter ribbons and could not be subjected to duty on that basis. The classification adopted in the impugned order was incorrect and the demand failed.
Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded and the duty demand was set aside because the goods had not yet acquired the essential character of the finished tariff item.
Ratio Decidendi: For Rule 2(a) to apply, incomplete or unfinished goods must already possess the essential character of the finished goods; where substantial further manufacturing is required, the goods remain unclassified as the finished article.