Modvat credit on returned goods for repair was denied; repair returns had to follow the Central Excise repair procedure.

Modvat credit was unavailable for carburettor assemblies returned by customers only for repair, because the goods were the assessee's finished products and were not used as inputs in manufacture under Rule 57A. The proper treatment for such returned goods was to follow the repair-related procedures under Rule 173H or Rule 173L of the Central Excise Rules. The ruling clarified that the Modvat scheme did not extend to repair returns of final products, so credit could not be claimed on re-received assemblies cleared after repair.

---

---

Issues: Whether Modvat credit was admissible in respect of carburettor assemblies returned by customers for repair, or whether such returned goods had to be dealt with under the repair-related procedures under the Central Excise Rules.

Analysis: The returned carburettor assemblies were the appellant's final products and had come back only for repair. The adjudicating authority treated them as not being inputs within Rule 57A of the Central Excise Rules because they were not used in the manufacture of final products. The appellate reasoning accepted that the goods were received, repaired, and cleared again on debit in the Modvat account, but held that the Modvat scheme was not intended for such a situation. For goods returned by buyers for repair, the proper course was to use the procedure under Rule 173H or Rule 173L of the Central Excise Rules rather than claim Modvat credit.

Conclusion: Modvat credit was not admissible on the returned carburettor assemblies, and the appeal failed.

---