Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the imported spark plug wire was classifiable as an electrical resistance wire so as to be excluded from the benefit of Notification No. 63/86, or whether it was a nickel alloy wire entitled to the notification benefit.
Analysis: The wire was to be treated as a resistance wire only if it was accepted in trade as such and used for its resistance characteristics. The chemical composition noted from the ISI specifications indicated resistance wires generally had about 15% to 20% chromium, whereas the imported wire contained only 1.57% chromium. There was no material showing that the wire answered the ISI description of resistance wire or that it was used in trade for resistance-wire characteristics. The earlier conference decision treating spark plug wires as other than resistance wires also supported this view.
Conclusion: The wire was not an electrical resistance wire and the assessee was entitled to the benefit of Notification No. 63/86.