Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the value of Mudguard Seat, Roof Canopy, Coupling Mouth and Coupling Bolt supplied with tractors at the request of specific buyers was includible in the assessable value of tractors.
Analysis: The disputed items were bought-out goods supplied only to some purchasers and were not shown to be component parts of the tractor. The material on record indicated that Mudguard Seat and Roof Canopy were not component parts, and the Coupling Mouth and Coupling Bolt were meant to connect a trailer, which itself was not a component part of a tractor. The supplies were found to be optional accessories, and their clearances were tied to specific buyers rather than forming an inseparable part of tractor sales.
Conclusion: The value of the disputed items was not includible in the assessable value of tractors, and the assessee succeeded.