Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the matter should be remanded for fresh consideration of the appellants' claim to exemption under Notification No. 69/87-Cus., after the appellate authority had accepted the tariff classification but not examined that notification.
Analysis: The refund claim had referred to Notification No. 69/87-Cus., and the appellants' case was that the reference to another notification in the appellate proceedings should not prevent consideration of the correct exemption notification. The classification issue had already been accepted in their favour, but the applicability of the relevant exemption notification had not been examined on merits. In the interest of justice, the authority was required to re-examine the claim afresh and permit the appellants to present their case before passing a speaking order.
Conclusion: The matter was remanded for de novo consideration of the applicability of Notification No. 69/87-Cus., in favour of the assessee.