Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Modvat credit was admissible on aluminium scrap generated at the appellant's service centre and whether such scrap could be treated as clearly recognisable as non-duty paid.
Analysis: The scrap was generated at the service centre outside the factory and it was not disputed that the scrap had not suffered duty. The eligibility claim under Rule 57G was therefore examined on the footing that the scrap itself had emerged from dismantling compressor parts and was not duty paid. On these facts, the scrap fell within the expression clearly recognisable as non-duty paid. The reference to Notification No. 185/88 did not assist the appellant because the scrap generated from the compressors was treated as scrap not bearing duty incidence.
Conclusion: Modvat credit on the aluminium scrap was not admissible and the issue was decided against the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Scrap generated from goods which has not itself suffered duty is clearly recognisable as non-duty paid and is not eligible for Modvat credit under Rule 57G.