Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether a specific transfer of goodwill was necessary to invoke the Gift-tax Act, 1958; (ii) whether the transfer of the business implied a transfer of the goodwill attached to that business; (iii) whether the valuation of the goodwill made by the Gift-tax Officer was correct.
Issue (i): Whether a specific transfer of goodwill was necessary to invoke the Gift-tax Act, 1958
Analysis: The gift was not confined to a cash payment; the relevant transfer was of a share in the business assets, and the value of such non-cash property had to be estimated on the basis of what it would fetch in the open market on the date of gift. The assessment therefore depended on the value of the property transferred, not on a separate, express transfer of goodwill.
Conclusion: A specific transfer of goodwill was not necessary; the question was to value the property actually gifted.
Issue (ii): Whether the transfer of the business implied a transfer of the goodwill attached to that business
Analysis: On the transformation of the proprietary concern into a partnership, the sons received four-fifths share in the business. The transfer of the business interest carried with it the commercial value attached to the undertaking, including the element described as goodwill, and the value adopted by the department represented the value of that transferred business interest.
Conclusion: The transfer of the business impliedly carried the goodwill attached to it.
Issue (iii): Whether the valuation of the goodwill made by the Gift-tax Officer was correct
Analysis: The business was valued at Rs. 1,76,630 and four-fifths of that value was taken as the value of the gift. The difference between that figure and the amount contributed by the sons was treated as the goodwill element, and the Court found no error in the method or the result of the valuation.
Conclusion: The valuation made by the Gift-tax Officer was correct.
Final Conclusion: The reference was answered in favour of the department and against the assessee, and the gift-tax assessment on four-fifths of the market value of the business was upheld.
Ratio Decidendi: For gift-tax purposes, the value of property transferred by way of gift is its open-market value on the date of transfer, and when a business interest is gifted, the valuation may include the commercial value attributable to goodwill.