Classification and exemption claims require fresh adjudication when lower authorities have not examined the merits properly.

Where classification of imported goods and entitlement to exemption under Notification No. 153/86 were not properly examined on merits, the appellate forum may set aside the order and remit the matter for fresh adjudication. The lower authorities had proceeded on an incorrect basis, with the refund claim rejected for want of citation of a notification and the appellate finding resting on the wrong tariff heading. The exemption claim and the nature of the goods therefore had to be determined by the original adjudicating authority in the first instance, and the matter was remanded for de novo decision on classification and exemption.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the matter should be remanded for fresh decision on the classification of the imported goods and the assessee's claim to exemption under Notification No. 153/86 dated 01-03-1986.

Analysis: The lower authorities had not adjudicated the dispute on merits. The Assistant Collector rejected the refund claim only because no notification was cited, while the Collector (Appeals) proceeded on an incorrect premise as to the applicable tariff heading. The applicability of the exemption notification and the nature of the goods as covered by it required examination by the original authority in the first instance.

Conclusion: The impugned order was set aside and the matter was remanded to the Assistant Collector for de novo decision on classification and the benefit of Notification No. 153/86.

Final Conclusion: The Revenue succeeded in obtaining remand, leaving the substantive liability to be determined afresh by the original adjudicating authority.

Ratio Decidendi: Where the merits of classification and exemption have not been properly examined by the original adjudicating authority, the appellate forum may set aside the order and remit the matter for fresh adjudication.

---