Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the disputed dies and tungsten carbide heading pellets were classifiable under sub-heading 8466.00 as parts and accessories of machine tools, or under Heading 82.02 / sub-heading 8202.10 as interchangeable tools including dies for drawing or extruding metal.
Analysis: The goods were found to be used in a cold forging machine as dies held by a die holder for shaping metal by pressure. Heading 84.66 applies to parts and accessories suitable for use solely or principally with machine tools of Headings 84.56 to 84.65, whereas the disputed goods were not shown to be machine-tool parts. Heading 82.02 specifically includes interchangeable tools and expressly covers dies for drawing or extruding metal. No material was placed to disturb the appellate finding that the dies were external working tools and not components of the machine.
Conclusion: The goods were correctly classified under Heading 82.02 / sub-heading 8202.10 and not under sub-heading 8466.00, and the classification adopted against the assessee was upheld.
Final Conclusion: The appeal failed on the question of tariff classification and the departmental classification was sustained.
Ratio Decidendi: Dies used as working tools in a machine, when expressly covered by a specific tariff entry, are classifiable under that specific entry and not as parts or accessories of machine tools under a general residual heading.