Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether presensitised printing plates were classifiable under Heading 8442.50 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1985, or under Heading 37.01/99 or 3701.99, and the corresponding old tariff headings under the Customs Tariff Act, 1975.
Analysis: The classification dispute had already been finally decided by the Supreme Court in an identical matter involving the same product. The controlling determination was that the imported item was to be used as a component of printing machinery and did not fall within the tariff entry for photographic plates and film. Applying that binding classification principle, the Tribunal held that the present appeals raised no surviving merit.
Conclusion: The goods were classifiable under Heading 8442.50 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1985, and not under the competing heading for photographic materials. The revenue appeals failed.