Settled classification issue prevents further appeal where earlier decisions already fixed rubber solution under the applicable heading.

Classification of rubber solution under sub-heading 3506.00 had already been conclusively settled in earlier appellate proceedings and was followed in the impugned order. Because the present appeal raised no fresh classification question, no further adjudication was required on that issue, and the appellate challenge did not survive. The discussion on Rule 233B was not examined, as the appeal was confined to classification. The appeal was dismissed for statistical purposes in favour of the assessee.

---

---

Issues: Whether the department's appeal on classification of rubber solution survived for adjudication when the classification issue had already been settled by an earlier appellate order and Tribunal decision.

Analysis: The classification of rubber solution had already been determined in favour of classification under sub-heading 3506.00 by the Tribunal and followed by the Collector (Appeals) in the earlier proceedings. The impugned order merely applied that settled position to the present case, and no fresh adjudication on classification remained for the present appeal. The reference to compliance with Rule 233B was not examined in this appeal because the appeal was confined to classification.

Conclusion: The appeal did not survive on the classification issue and was dismissed for statistical purposes, which is in favour of the assessee.

Ratio Decidendi: When the same classification issue has already been conclusively decided in earlier proceedings and the impugned order only follows that settled view, no further appellate order is called for in a subsequent appeal on that issue.

---