Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether SWG for wire was to be computed on the basis of the bare copper conductor or by including insulation for the purpose of extending benefit under Notification No. 220/78.
Analysis: The relevant diameter for computing SWG was held to be that of the bare copper conductor. Insulation was not a proper component for determining the diameter range because its thickness would vary depending upon the extent of insulation and the material used.
Conclusion: The computation of SWG was to be made on the basis of the bare wire without insulation, and the Revenue's challenge to the order of the Collector (Appeals) failed.
Final Conclusion: The impugned order granting the benefit on the basis of bare wire diameter was sustained and the Revenue's appeal was rejected.
Ratio Decidendi: For determining SWG in relation to wire under the notification, the diameter must be taken from the bare copper conductor and not by adding insulation.