Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether thermistors imported by the appellant were classifiable under Heading 85.18/27(3) or under Heading 85.18/27(1).
Analysis: The invoice described the goods as thermistors and the catalogue showed them to be semiconductor devices, but the decisive factor was the technical data indicating supply voltage of 240V/50Hz or 415V/50Hz. The proviso to Heading 85.18/27(3) required articles designed for use in circuits of 400 volts or above, or 20 amperes or above, or for use with motors of 1.5 kilowatts or above. Since the goods did not satisfy the voltage requirement, they did not fall within sub-heading (3). The remaining entry was sub-heading (1), under which the department had classified them.
Conclusion: The goods were correctly classified under Heading 85.18/27(1), and the claim for reassessment under Heading 85.18/27(3) failed.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a tariff sub-heading is governed by a specific proviso, classification must satisfy the proviso's stated technical criteria; absent such satisfaction, the goods fall under the residual applicable entry.