Modvat inputs retain eligibility after use if reconditioned and returned for reuse in the manufacturing process.

Rule 57F(3) permits Modvat inputs to be removed for repair or reconditioning and brought back for reuse, provided they retain their identity as the same input. Prior use does not, by itself, disqualify the goods from the rule's scope. Where the item remains identifiable after reconditioning and is restored for further use in the manufacturing process, the credit-linked benefit continues to apply. The appellants were therefore entitled to send the goods out for reconditioning and receive them back for reuse as inputs.

---

---

Issues: Whether inputs on which Modvat credit had been taken could be sent out of the factory after use for repair and reconditioning and brought back for further use as inputs.

Analysis: Rule 57F(3) permitted removal of inputs for repair and reconditioning, and the relevant consideration was whether the item retained its character as the original input. The fact that the goods had been used did not, by itself, take them outside the scope of the rule. Where the item continued to be identifiable as the same input after reconditioning and was restored for reuse in the manufacturing process, the benefit of the rule remained available.

Conclusion: The appellants were entitled to remove the goods for reconditioning and bring them back for reuse as inputs.

Ratio Decidendi: Inputs do not lose eligibility under Rule 57F(3) merely because they have been put to use, so long as they retain their essential character and are removed for repair or reconditioning for reuse.

---