Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the applicants were entitled to waiver of the entire pre-deposit and stay of recovery pending appeal in a dispute involving Modvat credit under Rule 57C of the Central Excise Rules.
Analysis: The Tribunal found that the controversy raised a serious and debatable legal issue, since the applicants' case was that duty on the intermediate product would have enabled corresponding Modvat credit at the other unit and the revenue effect was said to be neutral. At the same time, the departmental case was not accepted as one warranting complete waiver at the stay stage, and the Tribunal directed a partial deposit as a condition for interim protection.
Conclusion: The request for full waiver was rejected, but partial relief was granted by directing a deposit of Rs. 2 lakhs and staying recovery of the balance during the pendency of the appeal.