Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Department could adjust a demand of differential excise duty against the refund payable to the assessee when the demand had already been set aside as time-barred.
Analysis: The assessee had challenged the assessment endorsement under RT 12 before the Assistant Collector, after which a notice was issued and the demand was confirmed. That demand was later set aside by the Collector (Appeals) as beyond limitation, and the Department did not challenge that order. In these circumstances, the demand could not be treated as legally recoverable so as to permit deduction from the amount refundable to the assessee.
Conclusion: The adjustment was impermissible and the assessee succeeded.