Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether BOPP film/tape used as a separator in the manufacture of aprons and cots is an input for the purpose of Rule 57A of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 and whether any referable question of law arose.
Analysis: The Tribunal noted that it had already taken the view, on the nature of the BOPP film/tape used as a separator in the manufacture of aprons and cots, that such goods constituted inputs for Modvat purposes. In that view, the benefit of Modvat was correctly extended and the proposed reference did not disclose any question of law warranting reference to the High Court. The mere pendency of an SLP against a different High Court decision was held not to convert the issue into a question of law in the present matter.
Conclusion: The proposed reference was not maintainable as no question of law arose; the application was rejected.
Final Conclusion: The decision affirms the availability of Modvat treatment for the goods in question and declines to send the matter to the High Court for reference.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the Tribunal has already determined, on the nature of the goods used in manufacture, that they are inputs for Modvat purposes, a reference will not lie in the absence of an independent question of law.