CEGAT Condoned Delay in Pre-Deposit, Deposit Treated Timely The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, New Delhi, in the case of 1996 (5) TMI 150, condoned the delay in making the pre-deposit and treated the deposit as timely. ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
CEGAT Condoned Delay in Pre-Deposit, Deposit Treated Timely
The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, New Delhi, in the case of 1996 (5) TMI 150, condoned the delay in making the pre-deposit and treated the deposit as timely. The application was disposed of with Justice U.L. Bhat and Shri K. Sankararaman presiding over the case. Shri Rajesh Chhiber represented the Appellant, and Mrs. Ruchira Pant represented the Respondent.
The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, New Delhi, in the case of 1996 (5) TMI 150, condoned the delay in making the pre-deposit as ordered and treated the deposit as having been made in time. Application was disposed of. Justice U.L. Bhat and Shri K. Sankararaman presided over the case. Shri Rajesh Chhiber represented the Appellant, and Mrs. Ruchira Pant represented the Respondent.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.