1996 (4) TMI 226 - AT - Customs

Assessable value set for imported printing machine based on evidence and comparison.

The Tribunal in the case concerning the valuation of an imported second-hand Solna 425 Four Colour offset printing machine and the applicability of ... Valuation - Second hand Machinery Issues: Valuation of imported printing machine, applicability of Exemption Notification 29/88-CusIn this case, the issue revolves around the valuation of an imported second-hand Solna 425 Four Colour offset printing machine and the applicability of Exemption Notification 29/88-Cus. The Customs authorities rejected the declared value of the machine, leading to a dispute between the parties. The Deputy Collector enhanced the value of the machine and denied the benefit of the exemption notification. The Collector of Customs (Appeals) allowed the appeal regarding valuation but upheld the denial of exemption notification, prompting the Customs to file the present appeal.Valuation of Imported Machine:The Customs authorities contested the declared value of the imported machine, citing previous imports of similar machines at higher prices. The Senior Departmental Representative argued that the value was properly loaded after comparison with other machines. Conversely, the respondents' counsel contended that the comparison was flawed as it included machines with different specifications, such as Solna 425 plus, which were not directly comparable. The Tribunal reviewed the submissions and records, noting that the charge of undervaluation lacked sufficient evidence. The comparison included various imported Solna 425 machines, and the respondents presented a certificate from a Chartered Engineer supporting the declared value. The Tribunal analyzed the prices of new machines and the impact of differences in specifications on pricing.Comparison with New Machine Prices:The Deputy Collector highlighted an import of a new Solna 425 plus machine at a significantly higher price than the respondents' machine. The absence of a manufacturer's price list or catalog made it challenging to assess the price difference accurately. The Tribunal emphasized that while the price of second-hand machines might vary due to condition differences, the prices of new machines of the same model should not differ significantly. The Tribunal scrutinized the worksheet attached to the Deputy Collector's order, which detailed the valuation process for the imported machines and the rationale behind the assessable values assigned.Final Decision and Assessment:After careful consideration, the Tribunal determined the assessable value of the imported machine based on the import from Sweden itself, rather than from the U.K. The Tribunal found the valuation derived from the Swedish import to be more appropriate and fixed the assessable value accordingly. The Tribunal acknowledged the information provided during the proceedings and adjusted the assessable value to Rs. 7,64,872 CIF Bombay. Consequently, the department's appeal was allowed, modifying the previous order to reflect the revised assessable value.