Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether spun yarn containing wool, viscose and nylon was classifiable by applying the predominance-by-weight rule under Section XI of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985, or by treating viscose and nylon as a single block for classification.
Analysis: The material consisted of wool 50%, viscose 35% and nylon 15%. Note 2(B)(iii) was held inapplicable because Chapter 54 was not involved. Note 2(C) was also held inapplicable because it operates only where the yarn or fabric is equal in weight, which was not the position here. The fibres of viscose and nylon were treated as distinct textile materials and not as one block, since the notes contemplate each textile material being considered singly. Under Note 2(A), a mixture of textile materials is to be classified as if consisting wholly of the one textile material which predominates by weight over any other single textile material.
Conclusion: The yarn was correctly classified under Heading 5103.10 on the basis that wool predominated by weight, and the Revenue appeal was rejected.
Ratio Decidendi: For mixed textile products, classification must be determined by the textile material that individually predominates by weight, and dissimilar man-made fibres cannot be clubbed together to displace that rule unless the applicable note expressly so provides.