Classification dispute over agricultural implement parts remanded for fresh inspection and reconsideration after conflicting findings.

Conflicting observations on the availability and examination of samples in a classification dispute over parts of agricultural implements required fresh adjudication rather than final determination on merits. Because both sides sought a de novo decision and a proper opportunity of hearing, the impugned classification order was set aside. The jurisdictional Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise was directed to reconsider the matter after inspection of the disputed parts and with assistance from the assessee.

---

---

Issues: Whether the classification order concerning parts of agricultural implements should be set aside and the matter remanded for fresh adjudication in view of conflicting findings and the need for proper inspection and opportunity to the assessee.

Analysis: The order under challenge contained inconsistent observations regarding the availability and examination of samples. Both sides sought a remand for de novo adjudication after a proper opportunity of hearing. The dispute was therefore not finally decided on merits and required fresh examination by the jurisdictional authority.

Outcome: The impugned order was set aside and the matter was remanded to the jurisdictional Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise for fresh consideration after inspection of the disputed parts and assistance from the assessee.

---