Modvat credit classification dispute: defective sub-heading declaration alone was insufficient to deny waiver of pre-deposit and stay.

A defective sub-heading declaration was not enough to deny interim relief where Modvat eligibility itself was undisputed. The inputs were fully described, there was no allegation of invalid documents or non-receipt of goods, and the only objection concerned classification in the declaration. A mere difference of opinion on classification was treated as insufficient to defeat the substantive benefit otherwise available. On that basis, a prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit was made out, and recovery was stayed pending appeal.

---

---

Issues: Whether the appellants were entitled to waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery in a dispute where eligibility to Modvat credit was not in question, but the declaration/classification under the sub-heading was said to be defective.

Analysis: The inputs were fully described, there was no dispute as to eligibility to Modvat, no allegation of invalid documents or non-receipt of goods, and the only objection related to the sub-heading classification stated in the declaration. A mere difference of opinion on classification was treated as insufficient to deny the substantive benefit otherwise available.

Outcome: The appellants were held to have made out a prima facie case for interim relief, and pre-deposit of the duty was waived with recovery stayed during the pendency of the appeal.

---