Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee was entitled to be heard in revision proceedings under section 33A(2) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, and whether the orders passed without such hearing were liable to be quashed.
Analysis: The revisional order under section 33A(2) affected the assessee's rights. In view of the Supreme Court's pronouncement that the jurisdiction exercised under that provision is judicial in nature, the assessee was entitled to a hearing before the revisional authority acted. The earlier orders passed without affording that opportunity could not be sustained.
Conclusion: The assessee was entitled to be heard in revision, and the impugned orders were liable to be set aside.