Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether duty debited in R.G. 23 Part II under Notification No. 201/79-C.E. dated 04-06-1979 could be treated as duty paid for computing the credit incentive available under Notification No. 116/84-C.E. dated 11-05-1984.
Analysis: The governing clarification and circular provided that Notification No. 201/79-C.E. operated as an exemption by way of credit in respect of duty equivalent to that paid on inputs, and that for computing the credit available under Notification No. 116/84-C.E., duties paid from both PLA and R.G. 23 Part II maintained under Notification No. 201/79-C.E. were to be taken into account. On that basis, the distinction suggested between duty paid through PLA and duty debited in R.G. 23 Part II was rejected for the purpose of determining entitlement to the incentive.
Conclusion: The respondents were held entitled to the benefit of Notification No. 116/84-C.E., and the appeals were rejected.