Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the stay applications arising out of a dispute between a public sector undertaking and the Government department required adjudication on merits, and whether recovery of dues by coercive measures should be permitted pending consideration by the Committee of Secretaries.
Analysis: The dispute was treated as one falling within the Supreme Court's directions for settlement of disputes between public sector undertakings and Government departments through negotiation by the Committee of Secretaries. Pending clearance from that Committee, coercive recovery was not to be pursued and any detention for recovery was to be lifted. No order on the stay applications on merits was made.
Outcome: Directions were issued for reference of the dispute through the concerned Secretaries to the Committee of Secretaries, and recovery by coercive measures was restrained until the dispute was cleared by that Committee.