Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the market value of unsold paddy was to be determined under rule 4(2)(a) on the procurement rate fixed for the accounting year, rather than on the average locality price of the previous year.
Analysis: The accounting year had become academic in view of the procurement control regime and the price-fixing order governing the sale of paddy. The order fixed the maximum price at which paddy could be bought or sold in wholesale quantities, and the assessee's stock had to be valued in the light of that controlled price structure rather than by reference to an earlier year's average local price.
Conclusion: The question was answered in the negative, and the Tribunal was required to apply the maximum rate fixed by the relevant order to the entire quantity of paddy held by the assessee in the accounting year.
Final Conclusion: The reference was decided against the assessee on valuation of unsold paddy, with the controlled procurement price treated as the governing basis for computation.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a statutory or regulatory price-control regime governs the accounting year, market value for agricultural stock must be determined by reference to the controlled maximum price applicable during that year, not by an unrelated historical average price.