Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the imported impregnated filter paper, for the purpose of additional duty of customs, was classifiable under C.E.T. 4823.19 or C.E.T. 4823.90.
Analysis: The dispute was confined to the sub-heading within Heading 48.23, the basic heading classification not being in issue. Heading 48.23 was read as comprising two distinct parts: cut-to-size or cut-to-shape paper and allied products on the one hand, and other articles of paper pulp, paper board, cellulose wadding or webs of cellulose fibres on the other. The structure of the heading, together with the General Explanatory Notes to the Rules for Interpretation of the Excise Tariff, showed that sub-heading 4823.19 corresponded to the first part of the heading and sub-heading 4823.90 to the second part. Since the goods were cut to size, they fell within the first part.
Conclusion: The goods were correctly classifiable under C.E.T. 4823.19 and not under C.E.T. 4823.90, and the assessee was entitled to consequential relief.