Waiver of pre-deposit and stay granted on a prima facie Modvat dispute over mercury and graphite under excise rules.

Waiver of pre-deposit was granted and the impugned order was stayed pending appeal because the dispute raised a prima facie question whether mercury and graphite qualified as inputs or as parts of equipment under Rule 57A of the Central Excise Rules, 1944. The tribunal treated the matter as involving technical questions and noted that the commercial aspects had not yet been examined, while earlier Modvat decisions on similar issues were available for consideration in the main appeal. On that basis, interim protection was considered appropriate until disposal of the appeal.

---

---

Issues: Whether the appellants were entitled to waiver of pre-deposit and stay of the impugned order pending appeal.

Analysis: The application was considered on the basis of the prima facie controversy regarding whether mercury and graphite were inputs or parts of equipment under Rule 57A of the Central Excise Rules, 1944. The order noted that the matter involved technical questions, that the commercial aspects had not been addressed, and that earlier decisions bearing on similar Modvat issues were available for consideration in the main appeal. On the overall circumstances, the case was found suitable for interim protection during the pendency of the appeal.

Conclusion: Waiver of pre-deposit was granted and operation of the impugned order was stayed pending disposal of the appeal.

---