Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether refund under Rule 173L of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 was barred by Rule 173L(3)(i) when the aluminium circles had been cleared in loose condition and returned in the same condition, and whether Notification No. 43/75-CE dated 1-3-1975 affected the respondent's entitlement to refund.
Analysis: The returned goods were not received back in opened packages; they had originally been cleared in loose condition and came back in the same condition. The exemption notification prescribed a concessional rate of duty for aluminium circles generally and did not create any further special concession limited to the small scale or cottage sector. On these facts, Rule 173L(3)(i) did not operate to deny refund.
Conclusion: The refund claim was not barred, and the respondent was entitled to the relief under Rule 173L.